Do most Disney sequels stink? [Archive] - KH-Vids.Net Forum

PDA

View Full Version : Do most Disney sequels stink?


Gamefreak103
04-06-2007, 01:17 AM
Ok, I come from a Disney loving family and I must say.....
Most sequels stink....
They are just a gimmick to make a little pocket cash.

These sequels ruin their predecessors!

Only a few Disney movies are safe for now!

Hell, they made sequels for Bambi and The Fox and the Hound!!!!

What's next?, a Dumbo sequel?!!!!!!



They ruined Tarzan (one of my favorite Disney movies), if they touch Hercules (other favorite Disney movie), I will go into a mental break down!!!!!

Estellchan
04-06-2007, 01:28 AM
Actually I think they are working on a Dumbo sequel but to answer your question most Disney sequels suck. The Atlantis one was the worse though. The only exceptions I can think of is the Aladin ones and Lion King 1/2 (just because it was funny.)

rtrace
04-06-2007, 08:25 PM
Actually I think they are working on a Dumbo sequel but to answer your question most Disney sequels suck. The Atlantis one was the worse though. The only exceptions I can think of is the Aladin ones and Lion King 1/2 (just because it was funny.)

Actually if you look at the Pirates of the Caribean series the did a good job on both movies...though the ending for 2 made me hate Disney a little bit more.

Xadllas
04-07-2007, 06:31 AM
Actually I think they are working on a Dumbo sequel but to answer your question most Disney sequels suck. The Atlantis one was the worse though. The only exceptions I can think of is the Aladin ones and Lion King 1/2 (just because it was funny.)

Sorry but there is no word of a Dumbo sequel. The only sequel coming out now is The Little Mermaid III. Oh Beauty and the Beast the Enchanted Christmas and Cinderella III A Twist in Time are exceptions aswell (at least for me).

Ienzo
04-07-2007, 02:07 PM
I love the lion king, my sister grew up watching the first one but I grew up watching the second, so that one has more childhood memories for me, but I love them equally. Lion king III- when I first watched it, I thought it was rubbish so I didn't watch it for ages, I thought it didn't have enough lions in it. But now I like them all.

I've never heard of a dumbo sequel, I've never watched little mermaid or cinderella.

Estellchan
04-07-2007, 02:15 PM
Sorry but there is no word of a Dumbo sequel. The only sequel coming out now is The Little Mermaid III. Oh Beauty and the Beast the Enchanted Christmas and Cinderella III A Twist in Time are exceptions aswell (at least for me).

>_< Sorry I thought I heard about it. Thanks for correcting me.

Sorafan60
04-09-2007, 04:57 AM
I don't really like disney sequels. I bought Stitch the movie, haven't watched it for like 3 years. I like The Enchanted Christmas, the Little Mermaid 2, and The Lion King 2: Simba's Pride only because I grew up with those. All the other ones look like they're bad.

Aeon Sora
04-09-2007, 08:57 AM
Sorry but there is no word of a Dumbo sequel. The only sequel coming out now is The Little Mermaid III. Oh Beauty and the Beast the Enchanted Christmas and Cinderella III A Twist in Time are exceptions aswell (at least for me).

A new Ariel movie?! Interesting. As for the sequels, some of them are pretty good. For example the Aladin trilogy was great, and the fact that all the movies made first their appearance on theaters that proves it.

Now, of course there some sequels made mostly for money like the "Bambi 2" movie or the "Cinderella" but some of these sequels are pretty good. Besides Disney two or a year ago, i'm not sure, announced that in the future they will be focused mainly on sequels. I just hope they won't make a "Snowhite" sequel.

BirthBySleep
04-10-2007, 02:40 PM
The only Disney sequel I can say I like is Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest. The others I really cannot stand, as they're mostly all direct-to-video and meh. And Walt Disney never wanted sequels to any of his animated films, so they're going against his wishes :eek:

Mish
04-11-2007, 05:21 AM
I agree. I really, reeeeallly hate these sequels.

Why can't they leave classics like Peter Pan, Fox and the Hound etc etc alone? It's a molestation of my childhood. v_v

It's just because they can't think of new material. >.>

Zexion of the Twilight
04-11-2007, 05:24 AM
They will dry up every resource they have, and them they'll cancel KH, in which case we'll destroy them.

Gamefreak103
04-12-2007, 03:26 AM
I agree. I really, reeeeallly hate these sequels.

Why can't they leave classics like Peter Pan, Fox and the Hound etc etc alone? It's a molestation of my childhood. v_v

It's just because they can't think of new material. >.>

That is my main point, they destroyed the classics with these sequels.
If they touch Hercules, I will start a riot!!!


They will dry up every resource they have, and them they'll cancel KH, in which case we'll destroy them.

:eek:
Another good reason to go against the sequels!
If they did that, the whole KH community will start a deadly riot!!!:eek:

beth higdon
04-16-2007, 10:40 PM
Hate to bust your bubble but they have already made a sequel to Hercules and than a t.v. show. I agree that most of them suck. There is a few that are OK though. Aladdin 2$3, Lion King 2, Rescuers Down Under, Cinderella 3, and Bambi 2.

EvilMan_89
04-16-2007, 10:58 PM
yea, i noticed that almost all of them suck hard. like Little Mermaid 2, and Mulan 2 (never saw this one, but looks stupid as sh**)

beth higdon
04-16-2007, 11:00 PM
i don't like Mulan 2 very much but i like the princess

Gamefreak103
04-17-2007, 12:43 AM
Hate to bust your bubble but they have already made a sequel to Hercules and than a t.v. show. I agree that most of them suck. There is a few that are OK though. Aladdin 2$3, Lion King 2, Rescuers Down Under, Cinderella 3, and Bambi 2.

There is no Hercules 2. Anyways yes, I know of the series.
But there is still no sequel to Hercules.

BTW, if you were Misled by Hercules-Trojan War, it is a fake!
Just wanted to make it clear.

Kiryu
04-17-2007, 12:46 AM
I really don't like it when they make direct to sequel. I thought the hercules tv show wasn't to bad.

beth higdon
04-17-2007, 07:51 PM
There is no Hercules 2. Anyways yes, I know of the series.
But there is still no sequel to Hercules.

BTW, if you were Misled by Hercules-Trojan War, it is a fake!
Just wanted to make it clear.

before they made the t.v. show the made a direct to video movie that opened the show. Meg and Hercules are married and Meg finds his old high schooled album. Than it shows clips from the show. It is tideled Hercules: Zero to Hero

Oerba Yun Fang
04-30-2007, 12:49 PM
Yup the sequels do suck. I'm not a fan of any of them i think. I just a fan of the classic ones. The only sequel that i like is Pirates of the caribbean.
But i'm just mainly talking about the ol' classic ones, such as Lion King, Beauty & the beast etc.

HOSPITAL, STAT!
04-30-2007, 11:28 PM
...yeah, I think the point is pretty clear in this thread: Disney sequels do stink.

Though there always are a couple of exceptions, which is why I always feel the need to check out the sequels nontheless; some of them turn out quite to be enjoyable.

Lion King 1 1/2 is high up my favorite movie lists. =D

Spitfire
05-09-2007, 01:20 AM
I can safely say, That I feel that every single sequel blows hard, I really hate them all, I can't think of one good one.

Viroxor
06-04-2007, 04:48 PM
The Pocahontas sequel had only one redeeming quality, and that was the fact that it had Billy Zane.

orgXIIIfan
06-05-2007, 04:06 AM
The only Disney triologies that work for me are Aladdin,The Lion King and Pirates of the Carribean.They ruined Beauty and the BEast with the 2nd sequel which was boring(Belle's Magical World).Cinderella 3 was very good. The Little Mermaid trilogy is not really good eversince the sequel bumped in.Atlantis had the WORST SEQUEL EVER! nuff' said.

VI schemer
06-22-2007, 03:56 AM
DIsney destroys my favorite movies. Mulan 2 was awful!:mad:

Sanda
06-23-2007, 09:05 PM
I think sequels are just bad in general ;__;
(with the exception of PotC of course!)
But yea Disney does kill its classics by comming out with their sequels:(
I havent seen too many of them, only because the ones that I HAVE seen have proven to be such a dissapointment :{

rikurep
06-23-2007, 09:09 PM
only good sequel, lion king........potc sequels rule too

no-reality_allowed
06-23-2007, 09:42 PM
All disney sequels that are direct to dvd suck.

The few that made it to theatures aren't that bad.

orgXIIIfan
06-29-2007, 02:57 PM
Thank Mr Pixar.http://www.imdb.com/news/sb/2007-06-21/ He's stopping the Disney sequels! *Goes to his office and hug him* I am soooooooooooooooo happy!

Anderson
06-29-2007, 03:00 PM
Generally yes. I mean, two of my favorite Disney movies were Mulan and the Lion King.

The sequels can not beat the originals. It's just not possible seeing how well made most of the movies were.

libregkd
06-29-2007, 06:49 PM
Of course most Disney sequels are awful. The original ones usually are adaption of a famous novel/play. Now a sequel comes along, they have to do everything from scratch.

Twilight_Wish
06-29-2007, 07:38 PM
The only Disney sequels I've ever really liked are the Aladdin sequels and the Lion King sequels.

Ienzo
07-02-2007, 07:41 PM
I do prefer all the classics (apart from The lion King) because they are original but the sequels might just take the story too far.

GameFreak12389
07-06-2007, 02:05 PM
Not many are that good but, The Lion King II is my favorite disney movie. I love the plot and the characters. They did a great job on it. And like another person said, The Lion King movies are based off of Shakespeare plays. The Lion King is based off of Hamlet and The Lion King II is based off of Romeo and Juliet.

Xadllas
07-16-2007, 07:58 AM
Oh in case anyone was wondering, The Little Mermaid III will be about Ariel's mother Athena.

DisneyPsyco
07-17-2007, 06:32 PM
Not all Disney sequals are bad, but some like the Little Mermaid II or Cinderella II & III are kind bad. But some like Pocahontas II & Balto II are good. Bambi II is pretty good. I think it just depends on what reason they make the movie for.

Reptar :D
07-17-2007, 06:42 PM
Not all Disney sequals are bad, but some like the Little Mermaid II or Cinderella II & III are kind bad. But some like Pocahontas II & Balto II are good. Bambi II is pretty good. I think it just depends on what reason they make the movie for.

Balto not a disney :3

The only Disney triologies that work for me are Aladdin,The Lion King and Pirates of the Carribean.They ruined Beauty and the BEast with the 2nd sequel which was boring(Belle's Magical World).Cinderella 3 was very good. The Little Mermaid trilogy is not really good eversince the sequel bumped in.Atlantis had the WORST SEQUEL EVER! nuff' said.

thats the sequel for Beauty and the Beast i thoght it was a Christmas one i have

Not many are that good but, The Lion King II is my favorite disney movie. I love the plot and the characters. They did a great job on it. And like another person said, The Lion King movies are based off of Shakespeare plays. The Lion King is based off of Hamlet and The Lion King II is based off of Romeo and Juliet.

Your kidding me right? i thoght Disney stole the idea of Lion King stolen from Osamu Tezuka's (astro boy creator) Kimba the white lion Simba Kimba here is even an identical picture of the two movies: http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p267/InuKH2Sammy/Kimbasimba.jpg

and disney was going to make Simba white

Sorax
07-17-2007, 08:02 PM
To answer that simple questions, yes, most sequels stink

Some reasons, the graphics detail, way different, like the hunchback of notre dame 2
The first movie had a lot better quality
The second looked like a cartoon tv show in the 60's

Ienzo
07-17-2007, 09:10 PM
Balto not a disney :3



thats the sequel for Beauty and the Beast i thoght it was a Christmas one i have



Your kidding me right? i thoght Disney stole the idea of Lion King stolen from Osamu Tezuka's (astro boy creator) Kimba the white lion Simba Kimba here is even an identical picture of the two movies: http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p267/InuKH2Sammy/Kimbasimba.jpg

and disney was going to make Simba white

Sorry, may I just say the picture from the Lion King is actually Mufasa XD I watched the film too much. I would laugh if Simba would of been white.

ZakuraRabbit
07-17-2007, 09:22 PM
My Lion King DVD includes so many documentaries it's weird and I've never heard anything about Simba being white:p
From what they said in those documentaries, LK was the first Disney Movie which wasn't directly based on any book or anything (like Fox and the Hound and 101 Dalmations were) yet it is greatly influenced by Hamlet:p (there's a story behind that, Scar was originally a rogue lion but then decided to make things more "intresting" and made him Mufasa's brother, then they started seeing the Hamlet-resemblance:P that is all mentioned on the DVD)

Some Disney-sequels are good, others not as good, and some suck. I liked LK2 and the PoTC-trilogy.
Stitch the Movie was a little nah but Lilo and Stitch 2 was actally decent:)
I got Brother Bear 2 for christmas and I think it was a little too easy solved:p It wasn't nearly as good as the original (nothing ever isXD not even LK but still...) but it didn't straight out suck.
Cinderella 2 was just a mix of short stories. I hated it. Haven't seen the 3. and probably never will (unless it appears on Disney Channel, then I might see it while being on the computer or playing Game Boy at the same time....I tend to do that on semi-intresting shows)

Xejicka
07-17-2007, 09:33 PM
Yeah, most Disney sequels suck and it's part of the reason why I don't watc hDisney channel anymore. Only exceptions (there might be more later): PotC movies, Aladin movies and Kingdom Hearts games. You have to admit that KH2 was an improovement. A first for Disney to have a sequel that might actually be better than the original

Reptar :D
07-18-2007, 06:54 AM
Sorry, may I just say the picture from the Lion King is actually Mufasa XD I watched the film too much. I would laugh if Simba would of been white.

oh i know:sleepy:

khalidroxesnaruto
07-20-2007, 03:52 PM
I agree i hate these stinken sequals.......they make a big hit on the first movie. Then think theyll make a big hit on the second one! They just ruin everything!
Like lion king 2. What was the point of that.I really didnt see a lot of people buying it and not alot of advertise ,thats a sign that that was one of the worst!

Roxas is Hot
08-07-2007, 09:31 PM
The sequels always fail.

Ienzo
08-08-2007, 11:13 AM
Some of them are alright like Lion King 2 and 3 but I watched a part of Cinderella 2 and I was so bored silly with it.


My apologies for being so picky about the Kimba thing.

Roxasfan Xman
08-14-2007, 05:22 AM
Actually I think they are working on a Dumbo sequel but to answer your question most Disney sequels suck. The Atlantis one was the worse though. The only exceptions I can think of is the Aladin ones and Lion King 1/2 (just because it was funny.)

Actually if you look at the Pirates of the Caribean series the did a good job on both movies...though the ending for 2 made me hate Disney a little bit more.

I agree with Estellchan for the sequels to Aladdin and the Lion King. they were pretty good actually, and enjoyable. The Hunchback of Notre Dame II wasn't like the best sequel because of the fact that the villain wanted to steal some bell, but at least the gave Quasimodo a second chance to be loved again and finding true love.

For RTrace, I like PoTC: DM'sC, as for AW'sE, good sequel, but it too damn long.

So overall, a minimum of Disney Sequels were lame, but some were okay as in may not be the best, but it could have been better, and other were pretty good.

Riku Sora
08-14-2007, 09:00 AM
Not in my opinion. Well sequels like "little mermaid 2" were not good.

Spunk Ransom (:
08-14-2007, 09:51 AM
I just hope High School Musical 2 is good.

Akino
08-14-2007, 11:20 AM
I just hope High School Musical 2 is good.

High School Musical was never good IMO. Therefore, the second movie will not be as bad as the first one. I mean it isn't realistic!

I mean c'mon. Half of your school has a summer job at the country club, is that even possible? NO. I'd be scared out of my pants if half of my school have a summer job in the same place. D:

Prince of Twilight
08-14-2007, 11:36 AM
The only sequel I liked was Lion King 2.All the others are not really cool...

Nexit@h XIV
08-14-2007, 11:45 AM
You are sooooo damn right!! The sequels totally suck!!! For example, when I was little, Cinderella was a great movie, It was one of my favorites! But then they made the sequel for it...that sucked...It was horible...The same goes to Pocahontas which was a great movie too...but the sequel sucked too...C'mon! it was so different from the first movie! it's like, Pocahontas finds another boyfriend and leaves John Smith! What was that?!

Nymph of Destiny
08-16-2007, 05:21 AM
Well, some do, but I don't think all sequels suck. Like Cinderella and Pochohantas - those two were good.

koolashley
09-08-2007, 12:15 AM
If you count Pixar movies now...hehe...Toy Story was better than the first, in my opinion. Hunchback of Notre Dame II was good (going back to what Roxasfan Xman said), it shows what happened after and second chance of finding someone a nice, calm, gentle, etc. as Esmerelda was.

Xemnas7355
09-08-2007, 01:53 AM
Ok, I come from a Disney loving family and I must say.....
Most sequels stink....
They are just a gimmick to make a little pocket cash.

These sequels ruin their predecessors!

Only a few Disney movies are safe for now!

Hell, they made sequels for Bambi and The Fox and the Hound!!!!

What's next?, a Dumbo sequel?!!!!!!



They ruined Tarzan (one of my favorite Disney movies), if they touch Hercules (other favorite Disney movie), I will go into a mental break down!!!!!

I know they do suck....
But still I want a Nightmare sequal!!!!!!

beth higdon
09-08-2007, 05:06 AM
You are sooooo damn right!! The sequels totally suck!!! For example, when I was little, Cinderella was a great movie, It was one of my favorites! But then they made the sequel for it...that sucked...It was horible...The same goes to Pocahontas which was a great movie too...but the sequel sucked too...C'mon! it was so different from the first movie! it's like, Pocahontas finds another boyfriend and leaves John Smith! What was that?!

Can't change history! she marries John Rolf in real life. not Smith.

Soku
09-08-2007, 05:16 AM
Can't change history! she marries John Rolf in real life. not Smith.

Even though at the start, she never had any feelings for John.>_> I'm the kind of person who doesn't like to see something great end, so that wouldn't make the next movie epic win. Most win, others phail.

Nobody's Shadow
09-08-2007, 02:30 PM
I don't think the problem with Disney sequels is that they stink, the bigger dilemma is that they are forgettable. I honestly cant remember half the sequels that have been released or what on earth they were about. Thats why they fail in my opinion =/

~tReAh867~
09-09-2007, 02:04 AM
if we're speaking about the early animated movies, then yes (this excludes pirates of the carribean and such). i dont think i have liked any of the sequels. they are just for extra pocket money and show the total lack of creativity from the disney team. walt disney should just have lived forever so we could have new movies that are just as great as the original ones.

Ghetto
09-09-2007, 02:05 AM
if we're speaking about the early animated movies, then yes (this excludes pirates of the carribean and such). i dont think i have liked any of the sequels. they are just for extra pocket money and show the total lack of creativity from the disney team. walt disney should just have lived forever so we could have new movies that are just as great as the original ones.


true that XD

tummer
09-09-2007, 02:05 AM
some movie sequals sucked. these are some of my fav dis sequals that didn't suck.

lion king sequals
high school musical 2

Ghetto
09-09-2007, 02:07 AM
some movie sequals sucked. these are some of my fav dis sequals that didn't suck.

lion king sequals
high school musical 2

your right, it didn't suck, it FAILED. HARD.

tummer
09-09-2007, 02:13 AM
those were the sequals i liked

sequals i hate
tarzan 2
buzz lightyear movie
the little mermaid

X-thor
09-09-2007, 02:14 PM
Yes most of the Disney sequels stink

Ghetto
09-09-2007, 02:15 PM
Yes most of the Disney sequels stink

true that.

Repliku
09-11-2007, 08:52 AM
Yes, the majority of sequels stink. There's a reason they go straight from production to DVD and not to the movie theaters. No one would pay to watch that stuff. Some of them have made me really want to writhe and then toss the DVDs into the microwave and at least get a good light show from them because otherwise it wasn't worth the money. I have yet to see one that is not destructo-worthy.

Hobo_Donald
10-25-2007, 07:06 PM
Yeah, I practically agree with all of you, alot of Disney movie sequels usually stinks major eggs.

Probably the only sequels that I can accept are The Lion King: Simba's Pride, Return of Jafar and Aladdin and the King of Theives... because I grew up with those sequels when I was a kid.

kaseykockroach
11-25-2007, 01:30 AM
Its really something not worth ranting about really, since even the people making them are completely aware of their repulsiveness.
Personally, I think the TV series based on the movies were even worse(The Little Mermaid series had some of the ugliest designs I've ever seen, along with the Aladdin show). At least the DTV sequels were so bad, they were funny in a way. :D

Nailpolish <3
11-25-2007, 01:33 AM
nope. I think Lion King, Toy Story and POTC were very good.

The only ones I didn't like was Tarzan, Cindella, Pocahontas, 101 Dalmations, etc.

they sucked =/

disney, breaking another childs heart ><

Solid Snake
11-25-2007, 02:07 AM
Ya most do except for the pirates of the carabean movies

Dreadnought
11-25-2007, 02:17 AM
Yes disney sequels stink....

OneWingedHeartless
11-25-2007, 12:52 PM
I agree that a few sequel stink even more cinderella's sequel sucked the most

blue_neon
12-01-2007, 01:25 AM
I agree the sequels ruin everything. The originals are so much better.
Although there are some sequels that are good, most are bad.

O R A N G E
12-03-2007, 11:05 PM
The Land Before Time sequels are getting ridiculous. And the Lion King sequal made me want to barf. And so did Cinderella. Yes, I think you're right, most Disney sequels do suck.

GameFreak12389
12-17-2007, 09:07 PM
I love The Lion King II and The LAdy and the Tramp II. And to whoever said Simba was originally going to be white, he wasnt. Simba means Lion in another language. So no, his name isnt taken form Kimba, and the only similariy is the name and the rock. Not many similarities between the two.

Gwen
12-18-2007, 12:14 AM
The Land Before Time sequels are getting ridiculous. And the Lion King sequal made me want to barf. And so did Cinderella. Yes, I think you're right, most Disney sequels do suck.


I know what you mean with the Land Before Time =/ Its really pissing me off.

However, the lion king sequel was beautiful. I actually wanted to cry in the scene in the rain towards the end...

Princess Snow White
12-18-2007, 07:47 AM
The only Disney sequel I liked was the sequel and threquel to Pirates of the Carrabean.

Mielé
12-18-2007, 08:11 AM
damn straight disney sequels suck!

(except Lion King 2)

i mean, look at Cinderella, wtf, another 2 sequels! and both r gheeeeeey ><

Near-to-Tears
12-18-2007, 08:39 AM
Lion King II was really good, but the rest are quite sucky...

Asterisk
12-18-2007, 10:45 PM
Sorry but there is no word of a Dumbo sequel. The only sequel coming out now is The Little Mermaid III. Oh Beauty and the Beast the Enchanted Christmas and Cinderella III A Twist in Time are exceptions aswell (at least for me).

A third Little Mermaid?Kill me now! >.<

Kaiionel
12-19-2007, 05:31 AM
The Lion King II was just as good as the first one! I adore that movie, my sister and I used to watch it over and over. Kovu rocks. XD As for other ones, I don't know if Toy Story 2 counts, but that was as good as the original, if not better. Most sequels, however, are pretty awful. It's a fact we must accept. *sigh*

Twilight--XIII
12-21-2007, 07:18 AM
Well, it depends on a person's opinion. My opinion? Well, I was ok with some sequels, but the other ones... bleh...

Mr.Sprinkles
12-21-2007, 07:27 AM
Most sequels suck whether they be disney or not they did it to Legaly Blonde and Shrek and Cindarella

Godlas
12-21-2007, 08:00 AM
They all are kinda bad, they try carry on a perfectly made story to make more money and scroo it up. It's how the world is these days.

Lefolane
12-23-2007, 02:36 PM
I agree. They shouldn't have made the sequel. They should let the films in the way they are. That is very memorial. I was kind of freaked out when I watched The Little Mermaid 2. It's just.. 'WTH is that!? Aerial wanted to be a human while her daughter wanted to be a mermaid DD:
I also hate the disney in edition version. Because.. in ma country there are these. They changed the voice actors and what's more, they changed the lyrics(This really get me frustrated). They ruined the beautifully translated lyrics in original version! Grrr

Haseo
12-31-2007, 12:13 AM
The Land Before Time sequels are getting ridiculous. And the Lion King sequal made me want to barf. And so did Cinderella. Yes, I think you're right, most Disney sequels do suck.


Land Before Time isn't Disney...

The only sequals that are good are one that are release only 1 or 2 years after the original.

Number13Roxas
01-06-2008, 03:19 PM
Yeah most of the time they do save for some rare exceptions.

Kairi9020
01-06-2008, 03:27 PM
Some are REALLY bad. Like the second Litte Mermaid. That was just awful. Like, they tell us NOW Ursla had a sister..WTF?!
Lion King II was nice though... It was really sweet.

Oerba Yun Fang
01-06-2008, 03:43 PM
Some are REALLY bad. Like the second Litte Mermaid. That was just awful. Like, they tell us NOW Ursla had a sister..WTF?!
Lion King II was nice though... It was really sweet.

Ursula had a sister? o.O

Disney like to drag those movies out a bit too long, with sequals n' all, and it can affect people's view's on those types of movies.

Solid Snake
01-06-2008, 04:06 PM
alot of them stink but a few are good :3

Delicious ♥ Ambrosia
02-06-2008, 10:28 AM
Yeah, why can't they just leave it at "Happily ever after"?

Absol
03-26-2008, 12:57 PM
Yes. Horribly.
I liked the lion king sequels though.

yer mum
04-15-2008, 09:14 PM
Ok, I come from a Disney loving family and I must say.....
Most sequels stink....
They are just a gimmick to make a little pocket cash.

These sequels ruin their predecessors!

Only a few Disney movies are safe for now!

Hell, they made sequels for Bambi and The Fox and the Hound!!!!

What's next?, a Dumbo sequel?!!!!!!



They ruined Tarzan (one of my favorite Disney movies), if they touch Hercules (other favorite Disney movie), I will go into a mental break down!!!!!

They already did touch hercules..it was like a mini series when they got married..it sucked.

most seqeuls do suck but i didnt even see the first bambi or fox and the hound..what do i kno hah..but the lion king sequel was good (:

Pyrɸ
04-15-2008, 11:13 PM
prequels, sequels, or any kind of "quels" suck! DDDD:
Thay have ruined so many good movies. It depresses me!! DDDDDD:
Leaving it at HAPILY EVER AFTER is best... and this is not only for disney movies... but for all! T_T
POTC was ruined in this manner. It was good, but I was depressed.
DDDDDDDD:
The "quels" make me SAD....

Asterisk
04-15-2008, 11:21 PM
The very original animated ones sucked,yes.

Example: Aladdin and the King of Thieves.

Aladdin's father was in that one..could have been better written and animated.

Can anyone tell me why the first movie always seems to be done better?

Advent
04-23-2008, 03:03 AM
Only the direct-to-DVD ones in my opinion. Way too many Aladins 0_o...

Dove Syndrome
04-23-2008, 10:09 PM
Most do, usually the orginals are better. And the sequels are not the best in the plot depertment, like for example Cinderella. The first one was really good with the orginal plot, then the second was really 'eh' with the stepsister falling in love and some other things I think that I forget, and then the third one is about time travel!? Why can they just leave the orginals as orginals is because they want to make more money out of the best movies they have and ruin our childhood.

Royale
08-05-2008, 05:12 AM
Most orginals are better than the other ones. Like Cinderella. Theres like 3 now? Thats just retarded. Lion King 1 1/2 and 2 were pretty good though

John Clay Rice
11-04-2008, 06:56 PM
I'll never watch a Disney Sequel again.

LoneWolf
11-04-2008, 08:07 PM
Some of the sequels and prequals suck. Not all of them though, like Toy Story 2, that was a really good sequel I thought. But now, sequels of prequels and sequels...It better be REALLY good...

Cariad
11-04-2008, 08:31 PM
After seeing bambi 2 I refuse to watch any more disney sequels. They totally killed all the good vibes >.>

Mehgahtraun
11-04-2008, 08:46 PM
Aladin 2 and the Little Mrmaid sequals had absolutly no ales. Barely any, actualy, but not very much.

Fayt-Harkwind
11-05-2008, 02:29 AM
Depends on wether the story really needs to be expanded if they makle a sequel for a film that has a decent ending then thats no good usually like the Little Mermain and the sequel the little mermaid 2

Luna Lovegood
11-05-2008, 02:40 AM
A lot of them do, but not all of them. Bambi 2 was good. The Lion King 2 was ok, too. The Beauty and the Beast sequels weren't that bad, and I liked Return of Jafar.

Roxasfan Xman
11-08-2008, 04:20 AM
Depends on whether the story really needs to be expanded if they make a sequel for a film that has a decent ending then that's no good usually like the Little Mermaid and the sequel the little mermaid 2
Good point. I mean The Return of Jafar was okay, same for Aladdin & The King of Thieves. I just wish that they haven't changed the animation so damn much. The Lion King II was basically another parody of Romeo & Juliet, but with an alternate ending. The Hunchback of Notre Dame was more Quasimodo meeting a new girlfriend, no dark tones like in the first one. Pocahontas II was majorly historically inaccurate. So far Toy Story II was the best sequel that Disney and Pixar made. But the sequels to Beauty & The Beast didn't work for me.

I did enjoy Cinderella II a little bit, but I haven't seen much of Cinderella III.

As for Return To Neverland, makes me want to believe in faith, trust, and pixie dust. Gotta love that sequel.

Firefly
11-08-2008, 12:42 PM
That's stupid how all those sequels like Bambi II are made by DisneyToons, and not by the same Disney studio as the originals were. I think that's a bad move, because it adds something bad to the Disney movies, one after another. But Toy Story II, III, and Cars 2 are lucky since they're sequels made by the same company as their originals. Pixar's really good, they made a sequel that's better than the original with TS II, so I'm not tooo worried about TS III and Cars 2.
I just want DisneyToons to go away and burn and smoulder... If we're gonna get sequels to classics, they should be very good, not disapointing as they often are.

Luna Lovegood
11-08-2008, 05:58 PM
That's stupid how all those sequels like Bambi II are made by DisneyToons, and not by the same Disney studio as the originals were. I think that's a bad move, because it adds something bad to the Disney movies, one after another. But Toy Story II, III, and Cars 2 are lucky since they're sequels made by the same company as their originals. Pixar's really good, they made a sequel that's better than the original with TS II, so I'm not tooo worried about TS III and Cars 2.
I just want DisneyToons to go away and burn and smoulder... If we're gonna get sequels to classics, they should be very good, not disapointing as they often are.

DisneyToons has to make the sequels unless you want them computer animated. They fired all the original hand-drawing artists for some stupid reason (my friend was at Disney World at the time they did this, she was soooo pissed).

In_the_Twilight
11-08-2008, 06:09 PM
It's not that DisneyToons added something bad to the sequels, they just took a lot away. Something was missing: Good music, good storyline, good dialog, good graphics, take your pick.

It didn't make sense to have sequels to movies that had resolve and were better left alone. Little Mermaid II, for example, was unnecessary. They had their happily ever after.

Some of them were left open ended, like Pocahontas, but the sequel was still crap. I just pretend Pocahontas II doesn't exist, because it ruins the essence of the first movie.

Roxasfan Xman
11-09-2008, 03:29 AM
Not to mention the sequels to Beauty and The Beast. The first film already had a happily ever after we don't need to know about that other stuff from those two sequels.

The Fuk?
11-09-2008, 11:02 PM
Toy Story 2 was good. Beauty and the beast I think sucked. They should've made Bug's life 2 though, that would've been great.

Skylight_Defect
11-12-2008, 03:14 AM
Most Disney sequels do suck. Most Disney films end in 'Happily Ever After'
Why do we need to know what happens after that?
I did like the Lion King 2 though.

LittleArtistNamine
11-12-2008, 03:17 AM
I agree. I mean, what's the point of Cinderella 2 (That's a Disney movie, right?) I mean, yes, she was married, but we don't need to leanr more about her love life. Lion King Two was very enjoyable, but Disney needs to not end a film in "Happily Ever After" if they're going to make a sequel.

Kyubi the Keyblade Master
11-13-2008, 06:01 AM
I will say that some sequels have been rather odd in comparison to their original counterparts. But there have been some great ones, like Toy Story 2 and The Lion King 2. But in my opinion, the best Disney sequels by far are of the Pirates of the Caribbean series.

Roxasfan Xman
11-15-2008, 01:22 AM
I agree. I mean, what's the point of Cinderella 2 (That's a Disney movie, right?) I mean, yes, she was married, but we don't need to learn more about her love life. Lion King Two was very enjoyable, but Disney needs to not end a film in "Happily Ever After" if they're going to make a sequel.
I concur. One thing that I liked about Cinderella 2 was that it Anastacia a second chance of finding love in her side of the story. I mean that had to count for something as I said before.

water mage
11-19-2008, 03:47 AM
It depends which ones they are and if they have a good storyline or not. I was disappointed with the sequel of Little Mermaid or should I say the third one as well because there are made up characters that don't move the story line or have nothing to do with the oringinal story. In the third Little Mermaid movie I was hoping to see Ursula because I believe that she is King Triton's sister for it was annonced on the first movie under deleted scenes.

Roxasfan Xman
11-20-2008, 04:24 AM
Hmm.....good point.

I better check out Cinderella 3. I am not sure about Bambi 2, but I'll give it a shot.

water mage
11-21-2008, 07:14 PM
Cinderella 3 you will be disappointed for it has nothing to do with the second one. It is more like a prequel or a change of fate for Cinderella and it involves more of her youngest step sister Anatasia.

Ace Phoenix
11-21-2008, 07:28 PM
Ok, I come from a Disney loving family and I must say.....
Most sequels stink....
They are just a gimmick to make a little pocket cash.

These sequels ruin their predecessors!

Only a few Disney movies are safe for now!

Hell, they made sequels for Bambi and The Fox and the Hound!!!!

What's next?, a Dumbo sequel?!!!!!!



They ruined Tarzan (one of my favorite Disney movies), if they touch Hercules (other favorite Disney movie), I will go into a mental break down!!!!!

Actually i think they did make a hercules sequel a long time ago. for money i bet to/ Or it might have just been the show. It was called zero to hero or something like that... i don't remember.

water mage
11-21-2008, 07:31 PM
No they never had a Hercules sequel. The one you are referring to was the series of Hercules when he was an adolestant. It was called Hercules the series.

fire mage
11-21-2008, 08:00 PM
It depends on the story and plot. Recently there havne't been any good ones out lately. The new ones are either prequels where they add characters and the main character are EITHER still kids while in the orignal they are adult, such as Bambi and Tarzan. It makers no sense and should be called PREQUAL not part 2 of etc. Seriously Disney is losing their touch.
Other newer ones include their children get mostly a story, but not the main character whose is left out in the shadows. Mermaid 2,.

Or even bad animation. Such as the return of Jafar the movie sucked because half the time animation style was bad, but they made the third one better because the animation was a hell lot better quality. There are others out there like the third mermaid movie, and cinderella and other prequels that sucked as well.

Finale
02-28-2009, 03:38 AM
they always ruin the best
Tarzan
Lilo and Stitch
Lion king

why!!!
they fail!!!