This made my day.
Agreed. That sounds like... 1) You are anti-Semitic. 2) You disagree with the State of Israel's right to exist. Which is absurd.
This group has some kickass people. Kool.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dws87NR6DpM And yes, that is the entire song.
This whole matter is really absurd, but here's how I see it: 1) Hamas is a terrorist organization. Get that out of the way first. 2) Israel has gotten crap for decades, whether it's because of blatant anti-Semitism or from neighboring Arab/Muslim countries who deny Israel's right to exist. On the other hand... 1) The civilian death toll in Gaza right now is inexcusable. It almost seems like Israel is firing indiscriminately at whatever buildings they can target. 2) Both organizations really need to find a way to settle this before this escalates into something involving the rest of the Middle East.
It doesn't have a double meaning. It has 2 politically correct meanings (happy/homosexual) and 1 politically incorrect meaning (stupid/bad, etc.) Of course freedom of speech is being removed. That's what happens when capitalists and conservatives come into power. They say all they want is "order", and "peace", but in order to achieve those ends, they feel that they have to suppress the people's rights to do it.
I don't want to exist in a normal, capitalist, lawful society. Does that mean I should be downgraded?
June or July of this year. As has already been stated countless times.
They both suck.
They won't be telling you that you're fat, they'll be telling you your current health status and how you can improve. I don't see what's so wrong about this...
I'd tell some people how I feel about them (good and bad), probably write a poem, try to write a song, spend time with loved ones.
And this is why I'm a socialist. And equality can certainly change. World leaders, the Pope, Bill Gates, all of these people are considered better than others because they have power. You could almost say that they are more equal.
Yes. Mainstream acts, as you said, generally have no talent, but are simultaneously very appealing, which is what gets them signed in the first place (i.e., JoBros, Miley Cyrus/Hannah Montana, etc.).
I don't need to. It's that simple. I just see it that way. No need to be sarcastic, either. *coughDarkrequiem0cough*
Half full.
...he finds a better place? What was so hard about it?
It's commentary on where the world is going, what it could become, and seemingly perfect societies can be fundamentally flawed. (Communism, anyone?)
This is another one of those things (like stem cell research and abortion) that it's really hard to debate about. One could argue that you are saving the person/animal from pain, but you could also argue against it. I wold accept it in extreme situations.
There's really no point to this topic. You can't disprove the existence of God, and you can't disprove it either. You can argue either way without reaching a logical conclusion. So yea, what's the point?
How can you guys hate The Giver? It was Lois Lowry's best book. It won a Newberry, for Christ's sake.
