Search Results

I also hate :lolface:

Well, it could be worse. It could be 'TastyCreampieCake'.

:/gasp:



Wait...how the hell would you turn creampie into a cake?

I hate DemyxPlaysMySitar.







loljk

And 'Creampie'

O.o

Those girls aren't real.

Besides, two of them are clearly raping the other, so it is girls being cruel to girls.

Because the big bang has a scientific and logical explanation for coming about by chance, which I have posted. God does not. I am not saying 'there is no way God cannot exist', I'm saying its extremely unlikely and it makes more sense to me for him not to, which is why I don't believe in him.

They seem to have an obssession with cake.

Yup. 'Twas very annoying.

Me neither.


Hmm, maybe when I get 300 posts this will be my new name.

I repeat. The big bang had no cause. It just happened. You may think that doesn't make sense. But to me, it makes more sense than 'God had no cause. He just is.'

Ok, think of it like this. If I roll a fair six sided die, I have a 1/6 chance of getting a six. If I roll it again, then there is a 1/36 chance of getting a six both times.

So if we take a random example figure of 'Universe appearing by chance' to be 1/(1 x 10^100), then the chance of it happening with God as the cause would make the 'Chance that God exists' to be 1/((1 x 10^100)^2), which is a much smaller chance.

Exactly: WE try to find a point. Human understanding of the universe has made massive progress, but that understanding is not shared by all individuals. And so an individual will wonder: Why am I here? And I say: 'It doesn't matter. Get on with your life and deal with it.'

If you believe the things I do in conjunction with the evidence, then yes.

Does anyone else think its strange how whenever homosexuality or gay marriage is mentioned, everyone goes 'Argh, gay people, thats so horrible, men shouldn't like other men' but they seem to not have a problem with gay women.

A: Simple, chance, and how the laws of the universe work. At a singularity (The Big Bang), the known laws of the universe break down. Time, gravity, etc., they all cease to function properly. So why not the law about every action having a reaction? Therefore, the universe could have existed without a creator.

Of course, the chance of something coming into existence or developing in a certain way is very small, but the way probability works is that cause and effect is multiplied. So if God was the one behind these things, than that would actually make him more improbable.

B: Why? Why does there have to be a point? And if there is, why do we always find God as a convenient answer? If a plane flys over a tribe who are on a remote island cut off from the world, odds are they cannot understand how this is possible and attribute it to a God of some sort. Humanity finds something it does not understand and 'God' is used for lack of any other answer or effort. The meaning of life (or lack thereof) is no different.


I could go on for a while about why I believe God does not exist, but I'll leave it at that for now.

Ok. So the times have changed, so certain quotes are not relevant to current society. And some of them aren't meant to be taken literally. But if this is the case, then pretty much the whole book is either no longer relevant or non-literal. The bits that aren't, that are beneficial to moral standing, are basically summed up within a few short sentances and most people follow these basic moral guidelines, no matter what religion, if they even have one. If this is the case, what is the point of the bible? Or any 'sacred' text?


I'm not trying to rip you apart. It just makes me very sad to see so many people devoting big chunks of their lives to God, despite the fact he probably doesn't exist.

Best answer yet. At the end of the day, does it matter? So long as you're a decent person, no, it doesn't.

It was www.edwardcullenismyfantasy.net


OGame alliance boards. Its an online strategy game.

My parents only earn about £30000 but we have more food than we know what to do with. He 'earns' $50000. And no one is making him pay his friends bills, he can stop if he likes and get his own place. He has more than enough money for that rent.

Hmm. Even so, something tells me its within his budget of $1250000 plus

A liver transplant is a one time cost. I just don't think its right for people to beg when they can easily work.

Although I do agree that it doesn't make Australia a joke, just the individual.

Costs? He's 52 and he earns 50,000 a year. If we assume he's been doing it for say, 25 years. Thats $1250000. Which is a lot of money. More than enough to move somewhere cheaper and live quite comfortably for a while, rubbish job or no. My parents only have about £5000 in the bank and we manage just fine. No reason for us to move on the streets.

Nothing stopping him from going to another town or city.