Search Results

The first game's story is super simple and that's why I like it second most alongside Chain of Memories' story: nothing in it required another game's explanation: no moments of "Wait Kairi can just use a Keyblade suddenly???" or "But who the hell is this guy who took Ansem's name???" or "What the hell is Riku doing and why is he not-Ansem???"

Sorry but nothing is dumber to me than "WE BEAT XEMNAS BUT WAIT IT WAS JUST SOMEONE ELSE USING THE NAME XEMNAS MEANING THE NAME OF THE FIRST GAME'S BIG BAD IS...."Xehanort's Heartless"???"

And Sora going from "OH NO AXEL DED I'M SAD" to basically "KILL EM ALL 1989"

The Chi/X-whatever blade may be stupid because of its naming but as a CONCEPT it's just like a nuke for the series

Overwatch wins easily for me. A fun-spirited competitive game that a very varied fun character design and gives each player a certain role is right up my ally.

Believe me I know.

We're not talking about faithfulness or personal opinion; the first anime was just very successful and sold very well.

Not to say Brotherhood wasn't successful (it very much was), it just had the burden of following up on another anime based on the same manga with almost the same name that aired 6 years prior and it had roughly the same plot for (I believe) ~11 episodes.

Dirge of Cerberus is a pretty average third-person shooter that does little interesting for its own gameplay outside of Vincent going berserk every now and then though.

I rented it from I think Hollywood Video and beat it and still remember the silly Gakt song.

Did you not like all of it? The majority? I'm curious, because I really like the beginning and the bits with Peter.

I'm also definitely not "shocked" or "appalled" by this; I'm disappointed because I saw it coming and hoped it would have been tackled some other way. Like if they could do what certain computer companies are with, for example, external GPU's, to save costs while still upping performance, but even that would segregate the consumer base in a weird way.

I know the PS4 was already outdated but I also know I'm from what I can tell one of the vocal minority who actually wanted to wait longer for this console generation to start, so that the standardized unit would have began with stronger specifications.

And I'd say this isn't the same as all other cases of expensive tech because alternatives exist: namely, PC's which can be built and taken apart at consumer discretion (and budget, obviously.) The precedent of iterative gaming consoles to me feels like risking getting enough people to buy this new stronger system to makeup for costs of these new models, whilst also trying to keep the market that wants simple, all-in-one gaming consoles that have basically functional parity with every other model in the same title (all PS3's perform basically equally.) Because that's what I'm told each time I ask someone I know why they don't just build a gaming PC (not to push them toward that, but simply to see other perspectives.)

But people can spend their money however they want, regardless of what I think, which is exactly what Sony is banking on with this move.

Sigh...

I know that they're trying to ensure that the consumer base isn't going to be split up, and I admire the effort to require a "Base" and a "Neo" mode and no exclusive features, but...this just is so against what I feel the console consumer base deserves: iterative models at full retail prices instead of being able to upgrade specific parts (beyond hard-drives since you can already do that) at better values.

Like, what does this say to the people who only recently bought new PS4's? What if there's going to be an even better version just down the line? It sets a very uncomfortable precedent to me that doesn't fit consoles. I'm also not a fan of Nintendo's handling of the New 3DS.

But we'll have to see the numbers of if (or more probably when) this new PS4.1 is released. I hold very low enthusiasm if it's not obvious.

Woah slow down there

What do you like more?

Misty?

Whoops mine for eight years was apparently in February.

I'd love this option too. There are too many games where the soundtracks are extremely difficult to obtain legitimately. The least we could get are sound theaters like what's in Sonic Adventure 2.

And I brought that up by saying they're putting faith not in the actual source material and the film itself but rather in Scarlett Johansson.

Thing is, like I also said, there are already Asian actresses they could use who have some starpower and would fit the role 100X better than Scarlett would.

There aren't any Asian actresses as famous as Scarlett, not anymore (Lucy isn't that popular these days), and we're not going to get any if we keep giving roles to Scarlett and other non-Asian actresses when there's no good reason not to. This film would be the prime time to NOT cast anyone but an Asian actress in the main role, but we got this situation instead.

The original film from 1995 had two main female roles, although one had a male voice.

What's that? My childish brain goes directly to a song about dinosaurs.

He has millions of dollars.

He's popular and has a ton of fans.

I'm pretty sure it won't matter if a non-fan misspells his last name.

Also....I also don't care if someone misspells my username???