A large part of Sony's image of 'being sh!t to their fans' has to come from the fact that they have an incredibly sh!tty PR department.
Excluding summer, since that really doesn't count: Christmas, hands down.
- Most American Dubs. - Scrapped Princess //JP - Spiral //JP - Tokyo Underground //JP - Ghost Hunt //JP There's more, but forget it.
AM I RITE?
It was a shame Send Heartless Angel killed in KH1, because the move itself originally isn't supposed to. The move is as it should have been in KH2.
I'll have you know although you can read that a certain way, none of those words were swear words.
... Why not? Sure, it's not very creative, but calling it space doesn't make it inexistent. They are real, but none have ever been measured to contain absolutely 0% matter in it. Yes, they are tested; every single time. The only thing that can't be disproved here is your theory of nothingness. By all means, you can believe there is nothingness, but nothing you've brought to the table is viable evidence of such a thing.
I don't like this **** censor and its ****ogous corrections. I like large c****s, although they can be quite b****. .. ****og clock.
'Lose' and 'Loose' are two different words, and mean totally different things.
Um, space is real. We fly spaceships into it all the time. And there are satellites that have been up there for decades. No vacuum ever created has been completely without matter in it. It's never been done in practice. Quantum Theory says no, Axel's#1fangirl. There's only a theory behind empty matter vacuums, but none have been empirically produced. We don't represent time. You put too much emphasis on human importance. We're species that exist in a realm of time. That's all there is to it. Time existed before you were born, and so will after you die.
Masochism is still a desire (that being to inflict physical/emotional displeasure on oneself in return for personal satisfaction), and there lies the ulterior motive. Much how people win to gain pleasure, masochists would lose to attain the very same thing. Both types act in accordance to fulfill a desire--a motive. Yeah, it's reasoning like that that justifies why true altruism doesn't exist.
Weird Al should sing the theme for 358/2 Days.
Green Tea, and this doesn't belong in the debate section.
Yes, now all you need to do is prove it.
Why did mankind need to mark the end of a day anyway? Why couldn't we consider time itself as a day that never ends? Mankind needed to end the day somewhere, and I guess they so happened to decide on 24. No. We die, but time goes on. By your logic, time would end the moment you died. But what about the people who live after us? Are they not also living in time? The time of your life ends, but not time itself.
Lulz, u speeled basturd rong.
In the end, the digital clock (or even analog) is simply a man-made creation to mediate themselves with a natural constant. There's no connection between 11:59:59 - 12:00:00 and the actual element of time. Time as we know it, is continuous. Those who use the lunar calendar celebrated Chinese New Year on February 18, 2007. That was the start of the new year of the Lunar Calendar. Most of the other cultures celebrate the New Year according to the Gregorian Calendar (the 1st of January). Now let's consider then, is there any 'true' New Year? Is there any real distinction between 2006 and 2007? Is New Year's on the 1st of January? Or was it on February 18th? In the end, there is no relation between when we celebrate the new year and what the new year actually is. Same with this issue of time. What if 100 years down the road, we change 'midnight' to what would've usually been 3PM in the afternoon? Therefore the new day would start with absolutely no distinction between night and day. There's no supernatural/spiritual/otherworldly connection between midnight and day and night. Just as how we can't see an atom but know it's there, there is a fraction of time we can't calculate. Not being able to calculate something doesn't mean it's not there. We humans just don't have the capacity to calculate it. There's no connection between the two. Mankind just picked a random interval and called it the end of the day. Why does a day have to have 24 hours in it? Why not 25, 26, 27? My point is they're unrelated.
Who does? XD Without some sort of ulterior motive, I doubt anyone goes into a match genuinely desiring to lose. What you make of that loss is what's important. Losing is necessary for growth; it's why every competitive sport/game has continually evolved, because there's always the desire to surpass someone, and also the desire to claim superiority.
But losing helps you get better. Getting your a$$ kicked in Melee helps you a lot more than winning all the time.
1000, actually. I made the edit already <.<;
