and all those panty shots. it's like i was playing a hentai.
the origins anime. that just came out. dont be clever. that was my first fucking video game.
bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net
i'm pretty sure it's the incest that's involved.
If this whole rep thing doesn't work out, is there a way so we can like someone's like?
it's 3 am here. you aint got no room to complain.
i mean, that's kind of the point.
but they could have made it something special and livelier. seriously, watching this pokemon anime is making me wish the games were like that, especially since i'm replaying it right now.
never ever happening. honestly, they shouldn't have even remade those first remakes when they did. it was too soon, no would have been the perfect time to do it.but they're not going to re-remake red and green now are they
'You generalized.' 'No u.' You guys... I think some of you missed the point of the thread. People are not upset because literally is changing into a different word. Language evolving isn't something to be upset about. People have a problem with the dictionary keeping both definitions because keeping both makes communication more difficult. You now have to specify which meaning you are using or make it obvious that you are being silly through tone or adding a smiley. Literally and figuratively were defined specifically so that you would use one when you were serious and the other when you were going for effect. Communication under those definitions was precise, clear and required little to no elaboration. They allowed and encouraged a high standard of communication. That standard has been lowered not because the word is changing, but because two mutually exclusive definitions are being used at the same time. The miscommunication is made worse by the fact that the original meaning of literally is not fading from use. hatok, you too seem to have missed the point. While gay is being used as a general insult, it is also being used in the following ways. People still have specialized homosexual hangouts that they call "gay" bars and clubs. People still call the annual homosexual marches "gay pride" events and parades. The word gay has been immortalized as a part of a borderless class of people known as LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans-) individals. This term is used by newspapers and other publications daily. When someone asks someone else if they are homosexual, their first word choice is 'Are you gay?'. Finally, when someone refers to a homosexual male, they call them gay. 'Oh, him? He's gay.' 'I have this gay friend who...' These uses are at least as strong as the generic insult, and they are more consistent. They are used here on KHV. There are homosexual members here who hear themselves described with gay much more often than with homosexual. It is used as a generic insult here as well. If the dictionary were up to date, it would show two separate definitions existing at the same time instead of a straight move from homosexual to lame. Before you say that this is just a part of the evolving process, think about why we objected. Nova and I object because the definitions are not mutually exclusive. Any word for homosexual, including homosexual, is viewed as an insult by much of society. Homosexuals get a lot of hate outside of generic uses for gay. When one person is not attracted to a person that the speaker is attracted, they ask with derision, "What are you, gay?" It gets a lot worse than that, resulting in direct bullying and downright appalling language. I once asked someone if they had been asked out by someone of the same sex and they proceeded to brag about how they smashed a kid's head in a locker for doing it. They talked about it and expected respect. What does that say about the atmosphere they are used to, let alone their individual opinion? With the two definitions side by side, homosexuals hear themselves referred to as gay by people they meet and hear people say 'that's gay' about things they dislike in the same day. How would you feel if your name because a synonym for lame? Defending these uses is incredibly insensitive. In your post, you rated someone lowly because they objected to these two definitions existing at the same time and the atmosphere they create. You are justifying a hostile atmosphere for gays and those who care about gays. Please stop.
people still buy game guides?
i thought it was obvious...
this needs to be a a full-fledged series. and it needs to be done for every gen. keep ash for the kids, but make **** like this for those who grew up with it.
yawn .
at least i'm the number one source and not the second. it would hurt my ego.
those words are interchangeable.
