Search Results

GameStop is for cockbags and tittylickers.

kthx

I am Atlas of KHV. If I go, the site goes.

Or not. I could care less. D:

You mean since the day it was conceived.

A gamer doesn't work at GameStop, therefore their opinions are minimal. What a waste of time if you ask me, to bother with their opinion.

I will agree it has been too long, but really a game takes a lot of work. It could mean S-E is working hard on it. It could also mean they are dragging out our patience so we buy it without concern to how good it is.

Caught him with a dusk ball. Took me 4 tosses. lol

Drinking in short term.

Smoking in long term.

Drinking statistically causes the most damage in a wide range of ways. For instance, drunk driving accidents between other cars (multiple, even), people and buildings. However smoking causes heart and lung diseases, most of the time are among the highest mortality rate in their tier for that particular organ.

They are awesome. I have all their CD's, fantastic band.

You are like my favorite girl on this website.

I do that to friends constantly. Fun.

That is likely the case. However this time around using that 3D pokemon engine, it's going to look a lot sleeker (much like how FR and LG looked much better than R/S/E).

Just a presumption.

If it were up to me I'd not pay every date. I'd pay every other date in order to keep a balance.

Unless I really liked her or wanted to get in her pants or she had no cash, then I'd have to pay every time. <:

It depends on what you like more--the older style or the newer style. Personally I prefer LG/FR because the originals were my first games (of course). But the R/S/E were good too. I had many good memories playing those.

I don't care how they sound, I'll always love their music. That is not to say if they sounded like country I would listen to them (since I dislike country a little), but as long as they remain a rock group and make music, I'm with them.

Even if it isn't their old sound, they are still very talented. I don't know why anyone would complain about a change in style. If they liked the band they wouldn't complain. It's still good. -shrugs-

But, it's a song, like Jerome said... so... you can listen to it... if you want.

-takes second door to the left to find Trigger and CM having a cup of tea... they are sharing-

Guys, Deathspank is still an admin. Why are you sipping the same tea cup, and where have my pants trailed off to?

Certainly. It erupts much more severely in the United States' system, since everything is so gargantuan in economic/financial stature.

Vigilantism is so common right now (tea party, for instance). At any rate, whether someone is more inclined to lead or not plays a large role, as you said. Because if an individual is genetically superior (in terms of strength, body structure and the like) then they will dominate. In our system however things such as that are secondary to monetary gain and profit.

It is very damaging in any monetary based system, not only communism, of course. Especially when competition and scarcity are the means of perseverance and prosperity. Which makes absolutely no sense to me.

That is a good way to look at it. In terms of what they are technically able to do physically, it would make sense they evolve in order to satisfy that superior ability (beaver and dams, a lion's muscular structure for hunting and surviving in its scarce environment). I still can't see how a gene for something like that could make sense. And "bad" genes feels like a misnomer. More like "unnecessary." A beaver won't need a blow-hole (and it will likely never attain one, obviously). Is this to say a gene could pass that negates all of these nurturing propensity's brought about by its other gene's?

If a mutation were to occur and a gene were to be created that deeply influenced that time of behavior occurred, that would technically mean that type of gene would be infinite, correct? What I fail to understand is a gene controlling behavior. A gene can produce phenotypes and genotypes, which influence technical ability (more muscle, less muscle, being tall, having more hair, etc). Could it be said that instead of a gene influencing an ability, it sets up the circumstances that allow the behavior to take place "instinctively", without the gene directly instructing behavior?

I see it that way because if genetics was that restricting there would be no such thing as "interests" because it would be down to the genetics entirely, to the extent of what is needed to survive. Still, we have a brain for a reason.

;o ummm k I just got on so I was planning on it. ;]

I had Gengar twice and then switched to Gyarados.

I didn't switch four times. I went Gengar > Gyarados. That's it.

Not if you have rare candies to beat regular E4 training to level 100 after EV training.

Communism only fails because it makes it impossible to persevere with competition adequately. That's why capitalism works, because you can build up and increase your level of living. However in communism everyone essentially gets paid the same. And that is dangerous because if money is part of the equation, you're going to psychologically want more and more, but you can't. So on the structure of it, it is corrupt. Vigilantism is a result of that mess.

It can also be the same with capitalism, however. The only difference is that the competition becomes so fierce and so huge, eventually you create monopolies. Then people take it into their own hands to help themselves because monopolies are apparently very dangerous.

Perhaps you misunderstood me. lol

Correct me if I'm wrong for the way I'm interpreting this, but there is a gene that automatically gives you a propensity to only nurture those of close relations to you? Like you said, genes that mean you're more likely to procreate and for your child to survive/procreate?

If the baby comes out of you, there is an unbelievably high chance you will take care of it--because it's yours--it slopped out of you. If the propensity is genetically determined, then what happens when memory is lost? If it is genetic that shouldn't change anything you feel towards the child, therefore you will still take care of them without knowing who they are?

By the by the one with the guy and the girl looking at each other is myself and my friend. Just a fyi 'cause i forgot to mention that.