Search Results

Watch VGCW.

It was in the final issue of Civil War: Front Line.

No it is. In fact it is remarkably simple.

Spoiler: wall of text rant

Instead of using the stick, the US government could've used the cookie, and used better incentives to get heroes to register. It could've also offered guarantees about the safety, secrecy and usage of secret identities. The registration should have allowed heroes protection if they submitted to registration and training, along with benefits, a salary, and psychological care. But the pro side used it to force superhumans into being slaves/soldiers or else they would be removed. And if people who broke the law and still did superheroics, then arrest them, read them their rights rather than DENY those to them, then put them on a fair trial, NOT send them to an extra-dimensional prison in the Negative Zone!

Also, maybe not trying to murder Cap for not wanting to enforce a law that, at the time of said attempted murdering by SHIELD, hadn't even been voted in yet. No wonder the guy decided to fight against it. In fact, him going underground was a terrible idea on his part! He technically wasn't a fugitive and if he stood up against the SHRA and pointed out how the Director of SHIELD just tried to kill him for not enforcing the not-yet-a-law, people would think twice about it, because he's Captain America.

Hell, maybe the law could establish some sort of Superhero Union run by government approved superheroes (like, I don't know, THE AVENGERS?!) which can enforce training, age, and education standards, ensure that superheroes cooperate with courts to provide testimony, and self police to ensure that members who break the law are brought to justice. The union keeps its own records and memberships so there's no danger of government intrusion into the process or from supervillains getting their hands on that sensitive information.

And how come no one in the Marvel Universe not mention the US government can't be trusted? Captain America himself faced no less than two government conspiracies - one when the president himself turned out to be a supervillain and the other when some high-ranking official was revealed to be Red "I am so evil even The Joker wants nothing to do with me" Skull. And then there are all the nice shadow agencies like Weapon X. No wonder Norman Osborn came to power so easily... Speaking of which, HOW DID ANYONE NOT SEE RED FLAGS WHEN THE GREEN GOBLIN WAS PUT INTO ANY POSITION OF POWER?!

Another thing that bothers me is that Reed and Sue Richards had previously had to deal with the government trying to put their kids into foster care, so they demonstrated that no matter how secure they think their records are, one of their enemies could still find out where the kids were supposedly being kept. The 'demonstration' involving placing a notation in classified government records that the Richards children had supposedly been fostered at a certain address. Within an hour of the notation being planted, the address in question got nuked by a cruise missile strike. And then Reed just turns around and decides he trusts the government to keep the identities of all his friends and allies secret?

Doesn't help Marvel refuses to release what the whole SHRA entails and keeps it so vague it litterally changes from issue to issue.

Get out of the car and have a legendary fight with Shia LeBeouf.

I could go on length with all the problems Civil War had, I really do not like it. But I'll just cut to the chase and say that the WHOLE plot of Civil War resolved peacefully before it had even started had anyone in the Marvel Universe not had their brains replaced with fish.

And then there was... THIS:

Spoiler

Running for your life from Shia LaBeouf.

But seriously, around.

Agreed. I really hope they don't do the whole "Oh the pro-reg side and Tony Stark were right all along" thing like in the comics. I mean, it was bad in the comics when they accidentally portrayed the whole pro-reg as the villains through out the whole plot when they were suppose to be the right side but it would be ridiculous if they tried it with a movie tilted Captain America, who's title character is the anti-reg face.

Make it two people now! To each their own though.

Personally I didn't care for it. Mostly because it had numerous problems that kept me from enjoying it. So I'm personally hoping Captain America: Civil War does a better job at telling the story better.

Wait, you liked Civil War? You are one of the few people I know who like the Civil War plotline. That is to say you are the only person I know who likes it.