It's the whole reason I go to karate, and the whole reason I'm a purple belt. Soon, though, I shall own it up with masterfullness. . . perhaps that wasn't the phrase I was looking for.
It should be possible to make an adequate theory based on logic, reasoning and pure problem solving. This is something science uses. Also, the scientific method, by who? Science. A lot of these things come from science. It is not comparable to the God theory because the God theory is an absolution. Science is trying to find the truth, whereas religions claims it has the truth. These are not comparable. So a discussion over who is right is pointless. The correct debate should be "natural physics, equilibrium, and occurence vs. intentional design/intelligent design." And this is about God, not which method is true. So let's get back on topic as to why God exists or not, not whether the universe was created by Him or natural occurrence of physics. (Stop the pointless banter or this thread will be moved to debate, or if bad enough, closed as a whole and merged with evolution vs. creation.)
Love you too Roseykins. lol
Ahhh, okay. That makes sense, then. I wish that wasn't the case in the world, personally. lol
I fail to see how everyone isn't socially equal?
Yesssssss 8D And awww. Your poor teeth. >: Would you like me to give you a massage? Not sure how I'd do it, but I could always improvise. D:
4/10 haven't seen you around much. I am the only one allowed to say that! >:
.... ?
4/10 I've never seen you before, but you look like you're well-enough known.
The number of posts you have now shows how sexy you are. Since that's the case, Evilman is the smexiest member here. Followed by Kitty (again), and then yours truly, with libregkd right after. If you have negative posts, you're fugly. That is not all, clearly: Edit: FU- I just noticed I'm far too smexy enough. EDIT: I'm genius am I not? Yeah, I know I'm not. <: But here that's what keeps me comin' back.
Of course Kay is smexiest. She's my goddess. ;D
8th season comes on today. I'm dying in impatience.
That is true. I started to think of that after I replied...XD I think when people say something as fact, it really isn't stating it as the truth, it is just their truth. To them it is the most recent form of truth they can conjure, so immediately it is already implied as their opinion. I was trying to point that out, as well.
I got bored. Shhh. lol Plus I'm addicted to Magic right now. :l
You aren't the only one. I thought it was terrible. The only good part was Kirstin Stewart. She was hot.
Was it God? Do we know that for sure? We don't. So don't resort to that argument. lol That isn't a very adequate analogy. One can just walk outside and show you right now that it clearly isn't yellow and it clearly isn't polka dotted pink. Though one cannot travel back 14/15 billion years (estimated time of the universe, apparently) and show you the universe forming or show you that God existed (or exists right now, even). They are abstract idea's at best, so condescending this topic is useless. This, however, isn't only active in this topic. Any idea ever construed ever is essentially an abstract distinction, so I can hardly see how anyone can sway anyone else unless they are unintelligent or not researched in how idea's, words and physical reality work. -shrugs- But that's just me.
I like this... I think one thing you absolutely need to add is depth. The stock is the only thing with it, and it doesn't have much. The BG needs it, and it needs a lot more foreground. Do something about the smudge to the right of the stock, as well. It seems sort of random... could be blended more. It's nice, though. Good jawb.
Lost me at hello. ...oh, wait.
I very much like it. I'd say to lose the black border, otherwise I have no comments. LOVING the painting look.
This is impossible to answer. No one can say for sure. For this matter, how about, "Prove God doesn't exist"? Also, an impossible answer. How about, "Prove an apple never goes rotten at this very moment"? There is none. You can only relate this case to previous cases and make an assumption it will go rotten. However, at this very minute, we can't prove anything. Much like we can't prove God does/doesn't exists. In fact, the truth is, in my opinion, if God did exist, it'd be in a different dimension at the very least. And he'd be far too out of reach. Our literary allegories (bible, Quran, Torah, and the like) are but human institutions to organize modern religion for empty maturity through intellectual static understanding of how this universe works. In other words, we created organized religion, and have completely misrepresented the God figure AT LEAST, before we go and say he doesn't exist. /rant It does contribute. Understanding why is always necessary before having any sort of proof. Especially in terms of divine belief, at the very lowest levels. Also, Rosey, this isn't a KH forum, this is a discussion forum. KH forums are upstairs. Down here this is off-topic. So... I don't know what you're trying to prove?
