Search Results

  1. O R A N G E
    Banned books are ridiculous. In all honesty, if a book is banned, I just want to read it more. Becuase usually banned books have interesting stuff in them that I would enjoy reading. I do not think any books should be banned. If what the book has in it bothers you, than don't read it, but don't force your views upon other people who may have thought it was good but didn't end up reading it becuase of some stupid reason.
    Post by: O R A N G E, Nov 22, 2007 in forum: Debate Corner
  2. O R A N G E
    NOO!!

    Pweese?

    I got brave enough to post meself!


    We want to see you DF!


    *dies*

    Post by: O R A N G E, Nov 22, 2007 in forum: The Spam Zone
  3. O R A N G E
    I thought the shows were filming what has already been written still? He should still be working, at least for now, and once its over he should get his job back, unless CSI completely fails becuase of the strike. CSI is immensely successful though, so he should be back in work soon.
    Post by: O R A N G E, Nov 21, 2007 in forum: Current Events
  4. O R A N G E
    Obviously Draco. XD


    I think that it was incredibly satisfying. It tied up most of the loose ends that she left open in the past 6 books. If anything, she could have made it more eventful in the time that they were going around in the tents hunting horcruxes. But I can hardly complain. It was nearly flawless.

    Yeah, the Ron/Hermione kiss made me giggle.

    Post by: O R A N G E, Nov 21, 2007 in forum: Literature
  5. O R A N G E
    What makes you sad? Why? I don't think anybody can tell what you're talking about.

    Please try not to spam here with posts like this or else this thread will end up closed.

    Post by: O R A N G E, Nov 21, 2007 in forum: Debate Corner
  6. O R A N G E

    I'm sure sometimes in the future it will be able to be reached. Technology has advanced pretty far, and if somebody was able to get as close as you stated above, I'm sure someday we'll be able to hit it. Probably in the next 10-20 years. Definitely in out lifetimes. I don't suppose anything too drastic would happen: You said people got VERY close. If nothing horribly wrong happened then, and no indications of anything ABOUT to go horribly wrong happened, I doubt it will. It will just be a scientific breakthrough, which will be cool nonetheless.
    Post by: O R A N G E, Nov 21, 2007 in forum: Discussion
  7. O R A N G E
    Do you have a source? I find that story about the woman hard to believe.

    Information becomes more credible when you list a source. I find most of the information you present in the first paragraph incredibly unlikely. Provide a source and I'll believe you.

    However, pretending for a moment that what you said was true, I find it as a violation of privacy. Things that never have been before are slowly but surely becoming watched by the government.

    What privacy do we have now that is not integrated by government ears? Telephones are gone, and now internet as well? How soon will it be before our very own speech is monitored to help prevent "terrorists"?

    If somebody is a terrorist, they're not going to go researching terrorism on the internet. That is ridiculous. Same as all laws passed to prevent "terrorism." Terrorists break laws anyway, so if you add a new one, they're not going to care if they have to break it.

    I think the entire thing is unwise. Our personal information should not be probed.

    Post by: O R A N G E, Nov 21, 2007 in forum: Debate Corner
  8. O R A N G E
    Thanks.

    And once I run out of pictures already saved on my computer I'll stop posting so many at a time XD

    But I haven't run out yet =D

    Here's one of me and my best friend. Her hair's wet, she had just gotten out of the shower.

    http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f290/Saltyaj/laurgab.jpg

    (No, that's not my last name, thats the start of her first name in the url.)

    My hair looks like it's a different color on the ends for some reason.


    Post by: O R A N G E, Nov 21, 2007 in forum: The Spam Zone
  9. O R A N G E
    Pointless soapesque shows are worse than Disney in my opinion.

    1.) The O.C.
    2.) One Tree Hill
    3.) Gossip Girl
    4.) Hannah Montana
    5.) That's So Raven

    Post by: O R A N G E, Nov 21, 2007 in forum: Movies & Media
  10. O R A N G E
    Only similarity I can see is that we both have blonde hair.

    http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f290/Saltyaj/hip.jpg

    Mish is a lot older than me too.
    Post by: O R A N G E, Nov 21, 2007 in forum: The Spam Zone
  11. O R A N G E
    The Lion King.

    That movie's got some crazy **** going on. I loved it. I saw it when I was 2. XD

    Post by: O R A N G E, Nov 21, 2007 in forum: Disney Galaxy
  12. O R A N G E
    ....It's featured on the front page of youtube. That's how you found it.

    I'd categorize it as mildly entertaining.
    Post by: O R A N G E, Nov 21, 2007 in forum: Movies & Media
  13. O R A N G E
    That's not a very nice way to welcome somebody to the site.....

    The Admins WON'T eat you, I promise.

    Have fun. Don't be afraid PM the Admins if need be, becuase I swear they're harmless on the inside.

    Post by: O R A N G E, Nov 21, 2007 in forum: Introductions & Departures