Search Results

  1. Styx
    Straight Girls Were Dresses is hot. It's basically Katy Perry's "I Kissed A Girl" but instead of some wannabe lesbo tasting cherry chapsticks we have a **** on an acoustic guitar singing about how she semi-raped another muff diver in a public toilet.
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  2. Styx
    Jasper Erkens --- Waiting Like A Dog
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  3. Styx
    This. And whille you're at it, look up Only Straight Girls Wear Dresses by CWA.
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  4. Styx
    System of a Down --- Innervision
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  5. Styx
    -moved-
    Some of those were pretty hilarious.
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  6. Styx
    Billy Talent --- Devil In A Midnight Mass
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  7. Styx
    I mainly play single-player RPGs, and I often just enjoy seeing the story unfold. That being said, I mainly play them when I have little else to do nowadays.
    I don't care about high scores or other kinds of achievements.
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: Gaming
  8. Styx
    The Prodigy --- Funky Shit
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  9. Styx
    Probably, but it's more satisfying to win, more painful to lose and a helluva lot more entertaining to watch.
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  10. Styx
    I haven't vomited this much since I drank to excess last winter.
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  11. Styx
    Ever since the DSM stopped acknowledging Sadistic Personality Disorder as a valid diagnosis, I'm completely clean and healthy.
    Excuse me while I go laugh my butt off at you people's misery now.
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  12. Styx
    You heard me.
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  13. Styx
    I haven't read the members' answers but let me just crush them by saying that American football is really only rugby for pansies.
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  14. Styx
    If you say so. I'm more in the mood for songs that go well with Usain Bolt sprinting from one side of the screen to the other today, but to each their own I guess.
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  15. Styx
    Not yet .
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  16. Styx
    Because apparently it goes well with a squid side-strafing at 2 centimeters per hour.
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  17. Styx
    Now that you mention it... It does.

    Must be some boring-ass song.
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  18. Styx
    .38 Special --- Hold On Loosely
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: The Spam Zone
  19. Styx
    Wow...You guys are being conservative...
    Usually I find at least one argument of the other side that I have to admit makes a bit of sense, but in this discussion they all sound equally ridiculous... Oh, and here's why.

    The effort we used to produce and maintain our needs is now spent on manufacturing and maintaining the devices that provide these now.

    That small number can grow considerably larger if we can overcome the same fears you're now expressing.

    Technology doesn't replace our common sense, raw materials and basic teamwork. It reflects them. It takes common sense, materials and teamwork to invent and craft technology.

    Have you noticed how our health and basic living capabilities have improved considerably since we have become more dependent on machines? Just how many human mistakes and shortcomings have been bypassed by them?

    With an increasing population comes the need to bust some more heads than you could manage with swords and axes. Weaponry has always existed. Progress cannot be blamed for destructive purposes. If anything, bash weaponry as a whole and not the degree of advance behind it.

    People seem to forget that when an ability is no longer harnessed, it's because the need for that ability has perished long before it.
    Here's an idea: let's take those evil evil cell phones and revert to smoke signals and pigeons. Let's delete the entire internet and let all of those useful possibilities, from information to entertainment to communication, let's leave them to rot. Sounds mighty fun.
    Same with word processors. If we have a piece of convenient technology, what reason do we have not to use it? Why is laziness so bad when there's nothing else to do? What do you do when your house is clean: make a mess and start all over? No, let's focus our attention on what's still left to improve instead of clinging to old habits just in case those evil evil machines slurp away all our energy.


    Quality over quantity, my dear. Why live longer when you can live better?
    I say we try to incorporate as many people as we can in our welfare asap, and I really don't give two shits about that sucking the life out of the planet a little faster.

    Actually, there is always room to improve and always something new to think about. By prefering physical labor over technology, you're really no less of a sloth. For you see, standing still in the ongoing race that is progress and prosperity, instead of putting your brain to work , is as much a form of laziness as anyone else's. Got too much time on your hands and looking for a challenge? Then do research, think of something that will improve more lives still, or think of yourself and expand your social life for all I care. Technology doesn't make you lazy unless you want to be so. There we go, another misconception cleared!


    No, we cannot progress too far. We always progress as much as we want to. It's still our choice. We decide in which direction we go. We have decided that convenience has become key in our lives. We buy dishwashers and cell phones. If an idea doesn't break through, it's because we disallow it.
    I'll go as far as saying that "progressing too far" is more or less an oxymoron.
    Post by: Styx, Aug 19, 2009 in forum: Debate Corner
  20. Styx
    Pure water cannot be described by any of the basic tastes (sweet, sour, bitter, salty or umami) therefore technically it has no taste. If it does seem to belong in any of these categories, it's because of an extra ingredient and not from the water itself.

    /discussion
    Post by: Styx, Aug 18, 2009 in forum: Discussion