I don't fall in love. I repress my feelings from the moment they bud till the moment they're gone. Also, next time save yourself the trouble of treating Discussion as a spam section. They'll get deleted anyway as Flyn Pnut, Toshi and Dantheman have now found out. Go unleash your eccentric selves here here.
The second one by a long shot. I am perfectly fine with living with someone I don't love. While it's not exactly the same I'm living with someone I don't have any romantic feelings for right now and I'm not going to trade that for any generic crush anytime soon.
2/10 Sorry. The generic user titles don't seem too interesting to me anymore. :p
What Radiowave said. The stance that more and more people seem to take as of late.
As ridiculous as it sounds I do find it necessary to rub it in just long enough. :p
Same here. It didn't even feel all that long to me.
This and only this. You'd have to be deaf, dumb and blind not to notice. But you could still play a mean pinball. Indeed. I have it too.
Sounds like you need to get laid.
Bloc Party --- Positive Tension
Just for the record, I'm deleting all posts that just say "I agree with That Member". This isn't the Spam Zone; post-whoring is not appreciated here. I am keeping track of this and sooner or later warnings will fly. supersoravsdarkriku90 and Shadox D, I am looking at you.
This. I have friends that I hang out with more than others but there's nobody I trust completely. They know of me whatever everyone else is allowed to know of me. They hardly have any privileges over others.
Well they are supposed to meet in real life, so I think there's a certain "target group" that really can benefit from online dating sites. Then again there are a lot of charlatans around and some cases end up in heartbreak, but that's no different from real life I suppose. They can be risky, but they could help people meet up and get involved. The concept itself is clever enough, the people on it sometimes mess things up though. I think they don't deserve to be looked down upon as much as they are now sometimes but I'd never go on them myself.
I was just teasing you myself. ;) I'm not one to dissuade people from starting shitstorms and then try to start one myself. But for all intents and purposes I do think she had a point.
I saw five kinds of idiocy in that post.
I always use the Quick Reply button actually, except when I quote.
Rule Of Rose features two cases of child molestation, a couple of 10-year-olds that have something that would probably result in a make-out session, girls torturing eachother's pets for the heck of it, a serial killer who eats kids, a dog that attacks stuff for you and your main character fighting monsters with a dessert fork. So yeah.
Try to be a little more contributing with your posts, dear. This just looks like post-whoring to me.
Misty's plot spoilers have made me lose of the interest I had for this movie. I, too, hope that we're wrong on that. I still want to see how dark this can get though. The darkest version of an Alice sequel I've seen (well played actually) is American McGee's Alice. Let's see if Burton can compete with that.
I think you should go. You really shouldn't let the past hold you back when you're future's awaiting. You'll probably make new friends over there too, and that doesn't mean you'll forget the old ones.
Locked on request. Hope you had an enlightening chat. -locked-
