If there's a bit of an interactive bit I want to embed, how would I do it? Particularly, this: HTML: <iframe src="http://www.nearsightedraccoon.com/tppcountdown/pp.html" height="225" width="171" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style=""></iframe>
<iframe src="http://www.nearsightedraccoon.com/tppcountdown/pp.html" height="225" width="171" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style=""></iframe>
You(we)'ve apparently reached a wide audience in all the time before The Change. 767 notes and counting. If you have xkit, look at the tags.
For those of you who have it, how do you deal with it? Quite recently, I've learned that the forming of a caricature often helps to cope with it, as would any rationalization of an abstract concept like this. I just believe that "confronting" your depression is a fun, somewhat naive thought, since it's really just an downhill battle. How it helps people physically, I have no clue. There are others who tend to express themselves freely, completely bereft of the fear backlash or desertion. I don't know how this little faction does it; it's kind of difficult to imagine outright statements -- things you feel almost solely comfortable with in your own head -- being said aloud. I mean, is that a thing? Are there really people who have the strength to say "I want to commit suicide," or "I feel useless?" Granted, it seems that they are "asking for attention" by the standards of many (unfortunately), but they have the conventional sense to have taking precautionary measure before inevitably offing themselves. And finally, there are people with prescription meds. Personally, I envy those who can afford antidepressants. You can (please correct me if this is some fantastical misconception) pretty much whisk away all feelings of doubt, insecurity, hopelessness, bottled anger, and frustration with the jerk of your neck and the contraction of your esophagus. You might have some complimentary therapy, but what does that do for you? Again, for anybody who experiences depression and is willing to share, I'd like to know how others are dealing with it, and probably hoping for pointers too, if you have any.
3. 2. 1. COMMENCE HATE God, don't you just love the fans of BioWare?
i don't know if this is in the right section but I need help finding this image: View attachment 40124 But in a higher resolution. Yes, higher. So high that there is no way in hell that those pixels aren't getting drug tested. A big thanks to @Hayabusa for tipping me in on the fact that my sig crunches this pic to artifact-y levels. Not good, so I need something prettier to work with. Does anyone think they can find this?[DOUBLEPOST=1410323841][/DOUBLEPOST]ANYONE OUT THERE
View attachment 39216 View attachment 39217 View attachment 39218 View attachment 39219 View attachment 39220 I mean it's literally just 5 icons. Just messing around with shitloads of bloom and metal textures to enhance the tone of the brown hues in Sora's hair. The AntiSora kind of throws the color scheme off. All icons from this artist.
For those of you not tuning in on the drama, 4chan seems to be planning a "raid" in which they will bait and switch users by including "calm-down" site links that actually link to gore and pornography, "hacking" into certain user accounts, and filling popular tags with more of said gore and pornography. This is apparently in lieu of the amount of "social justice" and other "troubling" aspects of Tumblr itself, and the sheer quantity of users that appear to have transferred from Tumblr to 4chan. I'm not taking sides, just letting all of you know if it concerns you.
I am willing to pay you a lump sum of $200 for this exact description: G-Man doing vocals. Alyx Vance on drums. Headcrab Zombie on synth. Barney Calhoun on lead guitar. Eli Vance on bass. Any one of these iterations of this beautiful man on rhythm guitar, in a cover of Undercover Martyn by Two Door Cinema Club. In any location.
Like have a certain color of font, or a different font itself, or both. Suggestions?
Lets take a test!
Is it just me, or is Meet the Robinsons not given enough love for a Disney movie in the past decade? It's nowhere near the likes of Frozen in regard to financial success, and doesn't come close to the social acceptance and loving of, say, the Lion King. But it does serve as a wonderful vessel to carry out that famous Walt Disney quote. But it doesn't just serve as a vessel. Truly, the plot is well thought out (when you disregard the amount of confusion that can be caused by really thinking how the movie should have worked with the inclusion of time travel). The characters were pretty deep too (again, disregarding the majority of the Robinson family who just have brief appearances). Overall, it was lighthearted and good-mannered, and was pretty smooth for a movie that was made during the fusion of Pixar and Disney. (Did I mention that the movie was primarily Disney-animated?) Even though all the stops that could have been pulled out weren't, it still hits pretty hard at the end. I had my share of tears, if that counts for anything. Besides responding the poll, remember to share your input on the movie. I don't want to keep believing I'm the only one who truly liked MtR.
Finally doing one of these. A lot are avvs I've used in the past, and some are ones I never got to use. View attachment 38513 View attachment 38514 View attachment 38515 View attachment 38516 View attachment 38517 View attachment 38518 View attachment 38519 View attachment 38520 View attachment 38521 View attachment 38523 Not that many. I'll probably have more at another time. Sources upon request for most.
For all of you who end up wasting minutes, hours, and even days on TVTropes, here's something to test your trope-applying abilities! So this is how it's gonna work. Each User will/must correctly match the trope that belongs to the given example by the user above, or a trope that is a close approximation of said example. After they match the trope, they must supply an example of their own. Is that it? Seriously? Yes. There are rules, right? Tell me there are rules. Just the overly-stated caution of being nice to other Users, and to have fun! Okay, let's start. You find a small shack. Upon this shack, you see some of the latest satellite technology, as well as some exotic plants that you have never seen before. You knock on the door, and wait a small eternity. You wonder why you are wasting your time here. But this doesn't matter. What matters is what you experience next. The man you have been waiting for presents you with what you've been expecting this whole time. He is clad in short shorts, a tightly-buttoned short-sleeved shirt, and a pith helmet. They are all of the color khaki. The only deviant from this palette is his skin, which is a fine caramel, and his beard, which is as silver as can be. He has a Istiglal Anti-Material Rifle under his arm. He reeks of tobacco. What is this trope?
bye sbohem beannacht panamilit doei au revoir чао adeus zbohom it was really fun being a part of the community
I don't know about you guys, but... KHIII looks pretty intense.
I'm back. Don't know for how long. How is everybody?
N9w I realize we've 6een at this f9r s9me time already, 6ut at the risk 9f derailing the dial9gue y9u initiated, and may I just say h9w thrilled I am that y9u did, Karkat, I w9uld just like qualify my entire analysis 9f y9ur "Alternian culture" 6y saying that in c9ntrast with life 9n 6ef9rus, while y9ur pe9ple may have 6een engaged in vi9lent, lethal class struggle f9r milli9ns 9f sweeps, 6y n9 means d9es this imply that the 6ef9ran way 9f life was entirely with9ut pr96lematic elements, perhaps even m9re distur6ing and insidi9us f9r their lack 9f ackn9wledgement and 9pen discussi9n, particularly as a c9nsequence 9f what in my view were widely and dismayingly unexamined systemic s9cial injustices resulting fr9m the entrenched p9wer dynamics in play, dynamics strikingly similar t9 th9se 9f y9ur planet's markedly m9re 6ellic9se iterati9n, which has 9nly served t9 fully vindicate my hyp9thesis that such a hierarchy is really predicated 9n intrinsic dysfuncti9n, and failure t9 shift all the usual narratives and undiagn9sed pr96lems int9 an 9pen, judgment-free disc9urse thr9ugh which pr96lematic issues are c9nstructively channeled int9 m9re intelligently pr96lematized avenues 9f discussi9n. N9w 6ef9re I c9ntinue, it is 9nly decent 9f me t9 warn y9u a69ut certain triggers that are surely ahead in this essay. I mean c9nversati9n. Triggers include 6ut likely will n9t 6e limited t9 class 9ppressi9n, culling culture and vi9lence against gru6s, lusus a6use, c9mplementary and anal9g9us hate speech, pail filling, slurries and 9ther c9ncupiscent fluids, lifespan shaming, a6leist slurs, pr9lix dissertation... Actually, may6e it w9uld 6e easier f9r y9u t9 list y9ur triggers, and I'll d9 my 6est t9 av9id th9se t9pics, 9r navigate them m9re delicately, if at all p9ssi6le? Great. It s9unds like y9u d9n't have any triggers, at least n9ne that y9u kn9w a69ut. I'll pr9ceed with cauti9n nevertheless. Just please let me kn9w if y9u start feeling triggered 6y anything I'm saying, and we can take a 6rief time-9ut while y9u summ9n y9ur m9irail t9 help pacify y9u, assuming y9u have 9ne. N9t that I'm presuming y9u d9, 6ut I heard that y9u did, is that c9rrect? If n9t, I ap9l9gize. I further ap9l9gize if y9ur 9rientati9n precludes the p9ssi6ility, as a pale ar9mantic, panquadrant demir9mantic, s9mething in the gray palesexual department 9r such, and h9pefully y9u are n9t triggered 6y such presumptu9us c9ncillian9rmative language. It w9uldn't 6e the first time I was guilty 9f such an inexcusa6le micr9aggressi9n, and I am n9t s9 96livi9us t9 my 9wn r9mantic privilege t9 6elieve it will 6e the last time either. I'm glad I 6r9ught up the su6ject 9f unexamined privilege, 6ecause it d9vetails 6eautifully with the p9int I was a69ut t9 make regarding 6ef9ran s9ciety and its savage um6ral p9tentiality which later manifested thr9ugh the kind 9f Alternian 6rutality y9u are all t99 familiar with. Th9se in the higher echel9ns 9f the hem9spectrum such as the ceruleans, 9r "6lue 6l99ds" (careful, 6eing l99se with such termin9l9gy is 9pening the fl99dgates t9 a wh9le h9st 9f t9xic signist language and hem9ph96ic slurs), when addressing the challenges faced 6y th9se l9wer 9n the spectrum, such as the midhues 9r in particular warm castes like um6ers, 9chres, 9r "rust 6l99ds" (an9ther slur, highly pr96lematic, deeply 9ffensive and triggering termin9l9gy, str9ngly impl9ring y9u steer clear 9f this term), they w9uld 6e well advised t9 check their cerulean privilege, particularly 6ef9re dismissing hardships 9r marginalizing claims 9f 9ppressi9n, which can 6e difficult f9r them t9 identify 9r empathize with fr9m their advantage9us p9siti9n within the 6ef9ran/Alternian p9wer structures. And s9me may argue that in 9ur peaceful "ut9pian" culture that we have freed 9urselves fr9m injustice and disparities in privilege in a p9st-scarcity ec9n9my, largely equal rights distri6uted acr9ss the hem9spectrum, and theref9re exist in a "p9st-spectral w9rld" (laugh 9ut l9ud), and theref9re there is n9 need t9 champi9n imp9rtant s9cial causes and there is n9thing left t9 de6ate, 6ut really n9thing c9uld 6e further fr9m the trutsh. Y9u just need t9 educate y9urself and carefully investigate the l9ngstanding p9wer dynamics in play. F9r instance, a seemingly "harmless" remark fr9m a cis6l99ded cerulean t9ward an um6er 9r G9d f9r6id a 6urgundy 9r yes even a warm-identifying physically-c99ler caste, a69ut their very l9ng term future plans such as 9n the 9rder 9f centuries, then this may pr9ve t9 6e a very hurtful micr9agressi9n due t9 the fact that l9whues cann9t p9ssi6ly live that l9ng themselves, and the m9re priviliged caste c9uld easily 9utlive d9zens 9f generati9ns 9f midhues 9r hundreds 9f generati9ns 9f 6U9Ys (6urgundy-um6er-9chre-yell9wgreens, n9te please av9id descri6ing the latterm9st as "lime 6l99ds" as it has hist9rically 6een used as an especially vici9us epithet). Such remarks can further trigger painful reminders 9f h9w c99ler castes, t9 s9me extent 9JAs, 6ut CIPs and R9yal-Vs in particular, have 6een a6le t9 use their tremend9us lifespans 9ver the millenia t9 gain a strangleh9ld 9ver the s9cial 9rder, have 6een a6le t9 c9mpletely dictate 9ur s9cietal ev9luti9n 6y ensuring 9nly their cultural agendas and narratives receive the dial9gue's air supply, assuring the c9dificati9n 9f th9se resultant ideals and deciding what "n9rmalcy" entails, and sadly these a6s9lutes 6ec9me internalized acr9ss the full spectral range, even within th9se 9f m9st c9mpr9mised privilege, and s9 y9u 6egin t9 see the cyclical nature 9f the dysfuncti9n and the resulting inertia against p9sitive change and raising awareness 9f the m9st underpr96lematized issues, which I think we can agree, is pretty pr96lematic. And really, it's every9ne's 6usiness t9 examine their privilege, even 6urgundies, wh9 may 6e su6ject t9 the pitfall 9f 6elieving inc9rrectly there are n9ne 9n the scale 6eneath them wh9m they enj9y certain privileges 9ver, which 9ff-spectrum tr9lls will never kn9w, such as th9se identifying as 9ther6l99ds 9r caste-multiples, "p9ly6l99ded", any wh9 hem9gl96ically ID as having a caste which manifests n9where (as yet kn9wn) in any9ne physically, 9r f9r that matter 9ffspecs wh9 physically d9 p9ssess such a 6l99d type, 9r "mutants" (VERY pr96lematic term, highly triggering t9 s9me, 6e warned), such as y9u and I, Karkat. 6ut this puts us 69th in a situati9n which t9 9ur kn9wledge uniquely all9ws us t9 understand and empathize with tragically underprivileged and unemp9wered gr9ups acr9ss all scuttles 9f life, thus aff9rding us 69th what I like t9 call a "uniquely underprivileged privilege", which, yes, is a kind 9f privilege we sh9uld 69th strive t9 check as well, whenever we can. This same uniquely underprivileged perspective as I'm sure y9u kn9w was disadvantaged up9n my p9st-scratch iterati9n as well, and while I have n9 d9u6t y9u justifia6ly came t9 revere that figure 9f y9ur planet's rich hist9ry and y9ur pers9nal lineage, and while his g9als 9f peace, equality, and a truly spectra6lind s9ciety, I'm afraid I pers9nally have tr9u6le c9nd9ning his meth9ds. I d9n't like t9 use the term "pr96lematic" lightly, 6ut, well, his tactics were n9thing if n9t massively pr96lematic, t9 say the least, empl9ying vi9lent uprising t9 effect change, and em6laz9ning his mark up9n hist9ry and his faithful f9ll9wers with the salty fl9urish 9f a single rude, sh9uted swear w9rd, it's n9t t9 my taste even th9ugh he is wh9 I w9uld have gr9wn up t9 6e in an9ther life. 6ut n9, I prefer t9 effect s9cial change thr9ugh rati9nal, h9nest disc9urse and c9ntri6uting t9 9ng9ing dial9gues, f9cusing 9n what sh9uld 6e the real g9als, thr9ugh keen adherence t9 the discipline 9f Pr96lematics, ensuring that we stay f9cused 9n successfully pr96lematizing a wide range 9f direly underc9mplicated s9cial dilemmas. It's nice t9 see we agree 9n s9 much. May6e we are n9t s9 unalike, despite 9ur drastically different up6ringings. Anyway, as I was saying, the st9ry 9f y9ur ancest9r, and m9re imp9rtantly my exhaustive list 9f misgivings with his appr9ach t9 s9cial change, is quite a l9ng and ela69rate 9ne, 6ut it actually fits 6rilliantly within the larger m9saic which captures the 6r9ad str9kes 9f my p9st. I mean 9ur discussi9n. Trigger warnings f9r the f9ll9wing c9ntent include: ancest9r 6ashing, faith shaming, l9ud swearing, t9rture, 6urn w9unds, ship sinking... again, seri9usly, just let me kn9w if y9u 6egin t9 feel triggered 6y anything, even slightly. We'll pause and see if we can really expl9re th9se issues, and identify exactly h9w I may have invalidated y9ur struggles.
But what happened to 6.0? On the style chooser, you have 7.0 and Mobile. Are we not going to keep 6.0 as an option?
