So what have I missed

You just quoted it.

 

Logic is not subjective. My statements are not dependent on any premises that would need to be proven by sources.

A punishment requires a fault by definition. If you want a source for that, check a dictionary or two. This fault must exist with one of the parties involved. If someone is being punished while they are faultless, then the ones exacting the punishment must be at fault for the punishment.

What about this requires a source?

 

I find it completely logical. Two parties are at work when a member gets banned. The staff, and the member. Therefore, two things can have happened.

1) The member did something stupid and against the rules and got banned.
2) The staff went batshit crazy and banned the member either by accident or in a rage the likes of which may only have ever been felt by the gods themselves.

 

The opposite is not true. Punishment requires a fault, but a fault does not require punishment.

 

By what you're implying we could ask this same question of you, and every other member of this forum for that matter. Then we can ask the rest of the world, because no human being is without fault.

 

I'm perfect.

 

Allahu akbar.

 

basically this.

 

If you were perfect you would have noticed that your avatar was distorted before me.

 

Damn, foiled again.

 

What if the distortion is intentional?

 

Well this thread turned into something that is not that great. So everyone feel free to just stare at this thread because I'm going to close it.

It's good that you guys are all caught up with what has been happening. However, just discussing about banned members and talking badly about them is not appreciated. People have their reasons, it's not idiotic or stupid, sometimes it just happens. I understand that everyone has their own opinions about everything, that's good but if you want to have this talk, you can take it elsewhere.

-Sabby <3

P.S. Be nice to one another (not a suggestion).