Threads about one member rule

unless it's flaming but there's hardly any flame threads.

 

Yeah, but that's kind've obvious...

 

The rule is stupid and ridiculous. As you know Shadowjak I've supported you through mostly all of your rants, and I continue to do so with this one :bounce:

 

With the way this thread is looking up, I'm sensing the rule will be removed...

 

Yup, and I'm thankful for al lthe support I can get.

We just need Sara to get on first...

 

Sara is on.

 

The threads about one person were getting out of hand, and something had to be done.

I'm half and half on it. If there's a page filled with threads about just one person, then there's a problem and it needs to be stopped.

I agree, the rule should be revised, but not completely taken out.

 

I had PMed her earlier and she replied saying I should create a Suggestion. Seeing as how you already created it, I just directed her to this thread.

So, she should be reading it shortly.

 

Hence why I said it needs to lightened up, not removed, just lightened up.

 

Right on, enemy shadow_jak!

Ban this corn cob:guns:

 

I'll talk to Sara when she gets on, at first I thought it was the same as the wedding rule, but now looking at how bad the spam's section's been getting without it...Yeah we need the One member rule back.

 

Spam isn't completely boring without it, though that is a valid point I suppose. I'm more supporting it because it's really inane to have this rule. Unless people start turning it into a fad again where there's like 5 threads on the first page about one user. Yeah, I know how hypocritical that last bit sounded >.>;;;

 

*Applauds* Thanks for that rant you made, shadowjak. I 100% agree with you.