whatever happened to the DN game??

...but isn't suggesting that somewhat saying that?
No, you weren't like "OUR VERSION WAS BETTER, IF YOU GUYS CHANGE IT, IT'LL SUCK"
But suggesting that anybody else shouldn't change the game/revive it does imply that.

 

What are you on? That was exactly what you said, several times, over multiple pages. You were saying that anyone who wanted the game revived, or alterations, were dirty pigs who should have their nails clipped. Now, now, we accept that you're supperior, you don't have to prove anything to us.

But it's funny when you use it against the person who wrote the rules :c

 

I've never been a shinigami D;

>Steal Death Note
>Kill everyone

Be the shinigami.

Spoiler: Slightly creepy

 

Doesn't really matter who's taking what seriously when you're acting like a ponce to someone, that's also in the rules in case you forgot

 

LOLZ. So suggestions now are enforcements? I cannot suggest to keep something as is? Who did I enforce it on? Where did I say that?
Every post I merely stated that IMO the previous version was better. Not once did I enforce that it should not be revived or changed. I said it's better to leave it alone as a whole. Not to mention I agreed to the reviving from time to time to avoid boredom. It will keep it interesting. Every moment, I stated my opinion.

Isn't suggesting things the point of gathering ideas before finalizing something? Hence the whole concept of "let's talk about it, hear suggestions and we'll come to conclusion." I stated mine. Others have stated theirs.

If I've supposedly enforced the "keep it the same" then everyone else have also supposedly enforced "let's change it."

 

well it is really fun, and no you can't kill me, i'm already dead

I APOLOGIZE FOR THIS THREAD, I NEVER MEANT TO CAUSE ARGUMENTS <3

Love you all :) xx

 

There aint no thang about poncing in da rules. Wait, who's being serious?

 

You were clearly not stating that anything was your opinion, you stated that the game was dead, and just trying to revive it would be like playing on a carcass, that the golden days were over and never coming back, etc. You stated all of this in a way that implied it was fact. But that's just my opinion.

 

So what do you call dogging people about a supposed superiority complex

'Cause I sho's hell don't call it playing nice

 

Loving the LOLcatz :P

 

That's the same way I read it.

 

It's actually amusing that all of this came out of that thing, which was mostly meant as a joke considering the content of my post and me being one of the oldest members of the site. But I really don't mind all of this.

 

Wow...I said that in regards to the number of times it died despite its revival. What does it mean when you constantly revive a game in hopes to run it for a long time, yet it dies within a few weeks? Shouldn't that imply that the game's been milked for all its worth already?
Golden days = when we had 10+ players, or the "honeymoon phase" of the game when omg everyone wanted to play. *facepalm*

 

It was constantly active for half a year in 2010, had quite a few people playing.

 

i do agree to this point, we had it going for a long while, i know it deteriorated after Christmas, but i wasn't active either then so i don't really know what happened to it :) but we always had over 10 players and some games went on for quite a while, with less of the guessing and more skill by using clues

 

Good to know. =]

 

I hope you understand that this statement and the fact you've hung around here long enough to say it are contradictory

Also, you're getting on to Pyro about her wording making her look as if she's making factual claims, then you act like what you say and how you say it don't carry any weight? I don't buy it, broski.

 

I was acting with supperiority, and I am a really old member. That was the joke.

 

Wat. Think you need to look that word up. For definition and spelling